Should you re-up when a manager raises Fund II?

Testing the plan
Written By

Decide on the evidence of how Fund I was run, not on its early marks. When an emerging manager raises Fund II, the first fund is usually too young for its returns to settle. What you can judge is whether the manager did what they said they would, can explain what changed and why, and has a next fund whose design follows from that evidence. A larger target should never be the only story.

Why early performance is a weak guide

Cambridge Associates reports that funds take about six years to settle into their final quartile ranking. Most Fund II raises begin well before that. So a re-up decision usually rests less on Fund I's numbers and more on how the fund has been managed.

What to review from Fund I

Ask the manager to bring the original Fund I model together with actual investments, and compare:

  • Company count against target.
  • Average initial check against plan.
  • Entry ownership against plan.
  • Reserve use against the follow-on budget.
  • Deployment pace against the investment period.
  • Stage and sector exposure against the stated strategy.

Variances are normal. What matters is whether the manager can explain each one and whether the explanation reflects judgment or drift. Our guide on reading deployment against plan covers this in more detail.

What Fund II should explain

A well-prepared manager can tell you what Fund II keeps from Fund I, what it changes and what evidence supports the change. If the fund is larger, ask how the check size, company count, ownership and team change with it. A bigger fund with the same partners raises the capital each partner must deploy per year, and a bigger fund chasing the same deals can change the strategy entirely.

The operating side of a second fund

Raising Fund II while managing Fund I is a firm transition, not just a fundraising project. The team has to keep supporting the first portfolio, report to its investors and run a fundraise without leaving portfolio work dependent on one overloaded partner. Ask who owns the fundraise, how Fund I companies are covered during it, and whether the service providers and budget can support two funds.

Questions to ask the manager

  • What did Fund I promise, and how does what it did compare?
  • What will Fund II keep, change and why?
  • How does the larger fund, if it is larger, change your checks, ownership and company count?
  • Who covers Fund I companies while you raise?
  • What would you do differently if you were starting Fund I again?

A useful frame for the decision

You might sort the evidence into three readings. Ready: the Fund II thesis and construction follow clearly from Fund I, the Fund I evidence is current and explainable, the team can carry both funds and someone clearly owns the fundraise. Credible but incomplete: the direction makes sense, but specific evidence, materials or capacity still needs to be completed. Not yet: the proposed next fund depends on unresolved contradictions in Fund I, unavailable team capacity or assumptions the firm cannot support. These are a way to organize your own judgment, not a rating.

Related questions

Weighing a manager right now?

Send us the manager you are considering and Dr. Itzel Moncada will give you a free second read on whether their plan holds together and what to ask next. Request a Second Read, or see how we work with allocators.

Sources

These sources describe questions managers face when moving from Fund I to Fund II. They do not determine whether a particular fund is ready or how a particular allocator should decide.